"Computer stuff" and the Modern Language Association

Let’s say you’re like me: you find yourself going to this year’s MLA Convention in Philadelphia, but you’re not a “literature scholar,” and even if you were, you’ve found yourself both overwhelmed by the number of sessions from which to choose and underwhelmed in finding a speaker who wasn’t trying too hard. You could take a look at this guide to the conference from the Association for Computers and the Humanities. It’s not a perfect solution, but if I get any time to go to any panels, I will probably consult this list.

By the way: someone posted a comment about meeting up at MLA. My “dance card” is already relatively full. I don’t have that many interviews, but I have a few, and I want to save some time to do some school work and to see the sights with my wife. Maybe I’ll see folks in San Francisco.

For better or worse, Yahoo blocks family from dead son's email account

See this article, “Yahoo denies family access to slain soldier’s e-mail,” which was published in the Lansing State Journal but which was picked up by the wire services, too. Essentially, the family of a soldier killed in Iraq is asking Yahoo to release the dead soldier’s email account to the family, but Yahoo is refusing, citing its privacy policies.

I feel for the family. They want to have as much of their now dead son as they can. But it seems to me that Yahoo is actually doing the right thing here. For one thing, there is a contractual agreement, that part everyone skips when they sign up for the free account. For another, it is the dead son’s privacy. I mean, it’s entirely possible that the now deceased son has things in his Yahoo account he didn’t want to share with his family, and it seems to me his privacy wishes ought to be considered.

A tough situation, though.

Dramatic re-enactment of a conversation I had with my wife this morning

Me: Jeez, I just feel so bloated!

Wife: Hmmph.

Me: And I don’t feel like I’ve been eating that badly lately. I don’t know what the deal is.

Wife: What about the buttered popcorn and candy at the movies?

Me: Yeah, but…

Wife: And the chocolate? And cookies around the house?

Me: Okay, okay, but…

Wife: And didn’t you get yourself a treat at the grocery store? And you were drinking wine last night, and…

Me: Okay, let us stop talking about this now.

Jeez. I’m looking forward to the end of the holidays and travel extravaganza we’re going on starting tomorrow…

Christmas came early around here

We’re going down to Florida this Christmas (on Wednesday, actually) to see Annette’s parents and enjoy some warmth. It might be a “cold spell” in Florida right now too, but I’ll take “cold” in the 50s this time of year over the real cold we’re having in the 0s or so anytime. Anyway, because of the upcoming trip, we celebrated Christmas a week early.

As usual, we had a lovely tree/lighting display…

Here’s Will with one of the two PlayStation games he got, this one based on the brilliant Spongebob Squarepants Movie. Actually, it was kind of a “multimedia” theme for Christmas gifties around here. Will got a couple PlayStation games, I got a really cool DVD/CD/scrapbook combo thing about the new U2 release (which is excellent), and Annette got the “definitive” (for now, at least) 12 (I shit you not) DVD release of the complete Lord of the Rings movie, with all of the previously cut parts put back in.

Here’s Will and Annette watching all three movies on Sunday, which I think took about 10 or 11 hours. They did do other things: Annette did some sewing and ironing, Will did some goofing around. But it was still all about The Lord of the Rings for the whole day. I watched a bit, left during the boring parts, came back, etc.

Incidentally, we went out and bought Annette a new iBook G4 on Saturday. Basically, we had a bit of money from the car settlement and she needed a new computer, and she really needed a laptop because of her book deal and because of all the work she does in coffee shops nowadays. And personally, I wouldn’t get a desktop computer as my main workstation. So good for her.

The stolen minivan saga ends… I think…

Well, as my title entry suggests, the insurance company has settled with us on the stolen minivan. Loyal blog readers will note that it’s been just short of a month since I wrote about having our minivan stolen from right out in front of our house, and the insurance company said they’d wait three to four weeks to declare it a loss. True to their word, they closed the case on Monday.

As if that shitty minivan were exercising one final curse on us from beyond the grave, there were a few problems in these last days. At first, we couldn’t find the title, and no title would have made it pretty much impossible for us to collect any settlement check. Then, once we did find it, there was an issue with my signature on the title. See, the title had my full name– Steven Daniel Krause– on it. Over the phone, the insurance person told me to sign the form (which I did), and then she told me that it had to be signed exactly as it appears on the title. Now, my signature (like most people’s signatures, I think) is essentially a scribble. To me, it means “Steven Daniel Krause,” but it’s not really recognizable as anything other than a scribble with an “S” and a “K” in it. This was something that they were all uptight about, so I had to fill out even more paperwork and “correct” my signature by providing one that was legible but, of course, not really my “real” signature. Whatever.

After the $500 deductible, we ended up getting $3500. I don’t want to complain too much because that’s about what I figure we’d get back, but it is kind of an awkward amount. If we had gotten $8000 or so for the van, we would have had enough money to go out and get a new car; if we had gotten nothing for it, then we obviously wouldn’t have been able to get anything. $3500 is a sort of problematic figure because we could probably afford to buy another “crappy” car, but could that possibly be worth it?

Instead, I think we’re going to just stick the money in the bank and wait a bit. We are both applying for different academic jobs this year, so there’s a pretty good chance (I think better than 50%, actually) that we’re going to be moving this year, and where we move will significantly alter our automotive needs. We ought to know the scoop on all that by March, and then we will make our next move.

So, lavender Plymouth Voyager minivan, the van that I generally referred to as “that piece of shit,” the minivan that had more or less become “my car” for driving around town, good riddance. When people asked me what I thought of you, I replied “never buy a Dodge minivan.” You ran like garbage for all but the last year around, and you were a freakin’ money pit, you were the product of a dealer that gauged us repeatedly, and you reward this all by being stolen and (probably) being cut up into little pieces. So I don’t want to say rest in peace; I just want to say let the curse end.

And a few lessons I’ve learned about this experience I hope to apply in the near future:

* One of my work colleagues/friends is a car enthusiast, and he told me that if you are going to buy a used car, you really have to like (if not love) the car when you buy it. That’s where we went wrong with this minivan: long story short, buying the minivan was a highly unpleasant experience, and from the very beginning, we didn’t like it and even grew to hate it.

* Don’t buy a used car from a dealer because you’re just going to get ripped off.

* Buy Honda products.

* Keep the “full insurance” until the amount you are paying for the insurance every year exceeds the value of the car.

* Never ever EVER buy a Dodge product. Icky.

Examining the "discursive practices" of Christmas letters

See “Conventions of the holiday letter,” a story on NPR’s “All Things Considered” about those letters that all of us receive (and some of us even write) around this time of year. I had thought for quite some time that someone ought to study these things; Stephen P. Banks apparently did. When asked “what drew your interest to these letters?” he responded “Well, partly because we (referring to his co-researchers) had received holiday letters in our own past, and we found them to be kind of annoying.”

Ain’t that the truth?

The fall is officially over!

I just finished posting my grades for the Fall 2004 term, which means I’m officially “done” with classes until the Winter 2005 term, which is approaching a lot more rapidly than I would prefer. I have a few minor things to attend to around here, and then my wife and son and I are going to my in-laws in Florida for Christmas. From there, my wife and I are flying to Philadelphia for the (in)famous MLA Convention. I might post a bit about those experiences at a later date, but since I’m interviewing for jobs this season, I think I’ll be mum for now and then kind of vague about it all after.

And then we fly back to Florida, where we’re staying until January 4. Normally, this wouldn’t be that big of a deal, but a) I am WAY behind on planning my winter 2005 classes, and b) the winter 2005 term starts January 5, less than 24 hours after we get back from this two week trip. Hang on tight.

Anyway, that’s also a way saying that postings here will be sporadic based on Internet connectivity, work I need to do, and fun in the sun I will want to have. Happy holi-daze, everybody.

Google will want my U of M library books, eventually…

As has been widely reported (here’s a link from WIRED and here’s a link from BBC News), Google is going to be scanning the books of a handful of libraries around the US and England, including the quaint liberal arts school in Ann Arbor.

The Ann Arbor News has an article about all this in yesterday’s paper, too. Among other things, it says that no money is changing hands (and Google isn’t saying how much this is going to cost), and they think they are going to be able to scan all the books in about six years. Hmmm… given that the U of Michigan Libraries has around seven million volumes, I think I’ll believe it when I see it.

This sounds pretty cool, but for me, two questions remain:

* What’s going to happen with copyright and “ownership” of these materials?

* How are patrons going to “read” this stuff? Right now, U of M (and EMU, for that matter) has some “books” that are available electronically, and reading/browsing them is an enormous pain. You have to be online to browse them, it’s a web-based interface, you can’t take notes really, it’s hard to copy and paste passages, etc. The searchability element will be great, but will library patrons of the near future be able to download this stuff to some kind of reader? We’ll see….

Confusing “infamous” with “famous” in Ann Arbor

See this essay in today’s Ann Arbor News,“Student’s belongings hurled from 12-story window.” To quote from the article:

A University of Michigan student who told police he wanted to be famous broke out his bedroom window Monday morning in a high-rise apartment building and began hurling his belongings 12 stories to the street, Ann Arbor Police said.

As Officer Craig Devoogd approached the intersection of South University and South Forest avenues around 9:50 a.m., a large wooden dresser came crashing into the street, police said. A 5-foot-tall fan followed, both smashing into pieces.

Devoogd blocked the street as more belongings rained onto it and the sidewalk, Lt. Michael Logghe said. A desk, books, compact discs, pillows, computer equipment and personal items such as photographs and a genetics exam littered the street and sidewalk.

Not surprisingly, the young person was admitted to the University of Michigan Hospital for “observation.”

Yeah, finals are a stressful time, eh?