Steven D. Krause

Follow this link to a Tom Toles cartoon in The Washington Post. I would post the cartoon directly and I’ll probably download it to keep a copy of it if this link goes bad….

Well, at least online….

See this link “The NY Times wants less links” from megnut.com. (BTW, this is the blog of Meg Hourihan, who apparently was one of the people behind the company that started up blogger way back when). Essentially, The New York Times seems to be moving to an online subscription system, similar to what (apparently) The Wall Street Journal started doing earlier this year. As the megnut has it, “…increased traffic would drive increased revenue in the form of online advertising. And in the long term, I believe it would generate more income than charging US$49.95 for an annual subscription.”

Maybe. But I have to say that I am somewhat reminded of the tech.com bubble-burst. Back in those days, people thought that the idea of making “real money” was a sort of thing of the past, that the only “capital” you really needed to run a business was connections and links and such. Maybe it turns out that the NYT people have calculated that when it comes to the web side of their business, they’d make a bunch of money with subscriptions. And they’d still be able to sell ads.

I just remember the old days with The New York Times. When I was in college nearly 20 years ago now at the University of Iowa, you couldn’t get it on the same day; even the Sunday version of the NYT was a few days late. Then there were a number of years there, from about the time I was in my MFA program until I finished my PhD, when I lived in apartments without a washer and dryer. Sundays were laundry day and it quite frequently included a Sunday version of The New York Times. Often with doughnuts.

Nowadays, on those Sundays when I have time (they are rare), I’ll still go get a copy of The New York Times, though not usually with the doughnuts anymore. It isn’t the same reading it online. But then again, I have a lot of emotions tied to the paper, actually.

There was an article in yesterday’s Ann Arbor News titled “Blogs connect students but worry adults: Online journals, forums vulnerable to stalkers.” You have to register to read the story, and for folks outside of the area, I’m not sure that it’s worth it.

On the positive side of things, they do quote some folks who say good things about blogging. There’s a quote from a mom who was impressed with the writing and work done by her daughter on her Xanga blog. And then there’s this passage:

But Don Packard, a ninth- and 11th-grade English teacher at Pioneer High School, said online journals encourage students to write on a consistent basis and can stimulate their creativity.

Packard said that blogs and online journals should be used in a way that is positive and productive. He said he eventually would like to use something like a blog for students to comment on each other’s work in his class. “There’s a certain amount of frankness that comes with anonymity at times and it’s a frankness that’s necessary when talking about writing,” he said.

The rest of the piece is fear-mongering.

If someone didn’t know better, here’s what they would get from the rest of this article about”Web logs” (or “blogs”):

• Blogs are something only kids do.
• Blogs have no potential for educational usefulness.
• The writing on blogs is nothing but “family problems and issues with friends,” “innocent, carefree comments, as well as lewd, sexual suggestions,” “personal information, and sometimes insults or threats,” and just plain dangerous, full of smut smut smut of the kind that “could lead to stalking, and a predator could pretend to be someone else of the same age in order to get to know the student.”
• Xanga is the only way to post a blog.
• Xanga blogs can lead to fights.

And so forth. Here’s my favorite alarmist passage:

Karel Graham, an eighth-grade counselor at Tappan, said she just found out about students’ blogs a couple of weeks ago and is concerned about inappropriate content on a lot of them. It also worries her that many blogs have links that allow readers to e-mail the writer.

A bit later:

Graham said she’s also concerned about the effect online communication will have on children’s social skills.

“Kids are not learning to interact socially in a normal way through verbal communication,” she said.

Jeesh. Yes, Ms. Graham, let’s do all we can to prevent student writing from actually being read and responded to by others. Let’s make sure we keep young people from writing things that matter to them. Yes, let’s do everything we can to have “normal” “verbal” “communication,” presumably the way that you remember it before this new fangled internet thing. Back then, kids never talked about sex, there never were any problems, there were no fights, there were no stalkers’ right? And, yes, yes, let’s keep our children disconnected from the rest of the world and isolated within their own limited face-to-face communities. God forbid they make a connection with someone else outside of their immediate school or town; where might that lead?!

I am not completely unsympathetic to some of these educators’ concerns. Clearly, there are a lot of junior high and high school kids who need a little lesson in audience and the reach of the Internet– of course, as I’ve noted here recently in my discussion of the Phantom Professor and other anonymous bloggers, there are plenty of “grown-ups” who seem unaware of audience and identity issues on the ‘net. I don’t know if school is the place for kids to be updating their Xanga journals about who they’ve been hanging out with and what music they’re listening to, but I also know that these are the kinds of things that normal teenagers think and write about all the time. As John Lovas has written on his blog, I don’t think we ought to criminalize writing like this.

Two other quick thoughts: first, I’m beginning to think that blogging is something that is more than a “passing fad” because it is being reported as being so dangerous and exciting and fun for teenagers. As far as I can tell, that puts blogging in the same category as just about every other popular thing ever. Second, isn’t it interesting how these stories about the dangers of blogs keep popping up in things like newspapers, those things that a lot of readers have abandoned in favor of the new electronic mediums like blogs?

Okay, now I’m curious and I might dash off an email to the blog mailing list I’m on after this:

I figured out how to install WordPress (which was easy after I figured out what I was supposed to to with my config file), and I have something running here, http://www.stevendkrause.com/wordpress I have to say, I’m intrigued because there are a lot of neat features. But I am also full of questions. For example:

• Can I use one software install of wordpress to run two different blogs on the same server? How would I do that? Or do I have to have two different versions of wordpress installed? And if I do that, can I have just one of my two databases running both versions of wordpress?
• How’s the spam with wordpress? If it’s anything like the old MT, it’s a non-starter for me….
• Has anyone tried to import all of their blogger entries into a wordpress blog? With success?

I know I have other questions, but this is enough for now. In the meantime, I must say that I am so far finding wordpress to be bizarrely easy. Maybe too easy….

Update (May 18):

I took the plunge on wordpress for my unofficial blog, which is located here. I managed to convert all the blogger posts over to the wordpress format, too. I lost comments, I should go through and categorize things, and not all the links work anymore; other than that, I thought the transition went pretty smoothly, actually. Check it out.