Commentpress (and the problem of speaking of blogs on paper)

Cheryl Ball posted on tech-rhet a link to the future of the book project commentpress1.0, which is a WordPress theme that allows for “paragraph-by-paragraph commenting in the margins of a text.” The reason for this, says this post, is to help address this:

This little tool is the happy byproduct of a year and a half spent hacking WordPress to see whether a popular net-native publishing form, the blog, which, most would agree, is very good at covering the present moment in pithy, conversational bursts but lousy at handling larger, slow-developing works requiring more than chronological organization—whether this form might be refashioned to enable social interaction around long-form texts. Out of this emerged a series of publishing experiments loosely grouped under the heading “networked books.”

I’m going to have to absorb that for a while. I don’t know if this is actually a problem of blogs, or if blogs are necessarily better (or about?) presenting pity, conversational bursts and not larger and slower texts. The if:book people might be right; I’m just not sure.

I will say this for now though: first, while I have spent only about 5 or 10 minutes with it, I find the example on the if:book blog site, like this one, to be kind of confusing. Maybe it would be less-so if I spent more time with it or if I was smarter/groovier/etc. I do think the comments along the side there are not a bad idea though.

Second, this is exactly one of the things I was taking notes on/thinking about today with the BAWS project. I have a section/chapter that is going to try to contextualize the technology/tools of blogging as I collect my data/make my arguments, and innovations like this are precisely why. I mean, I don’t know where something like Commentpress is going to go, though, if I were to be a betting man, I’d say it’s likely to remain an interesting experiment and that’s about it. But I am pretty sure that by the time I actually finish my research, finish a book, get someone to publish it, and get it out in the world for people to read and respond to– which, the way that sentence feels to me right now, will be in about 83 years– there will be some changes in what we think of as a “blog.”

This is probably why most book/print projects on technology tend to avoid discussions that are too specific about technology/tools, but it is also one of the reasons why it is so important to describe the technological environment. After all, if you can successfully have a multi-layered blog-like text like the one the Commentpress folks are suggesting, doesn’t that change the theory/assumptions about how blogs function, as a writerly space or whatever else?

BAWS: Debating the role of blogs and a couple of items potentially worth reading

A couple days ago, I wrote about the Wall Street Journal Online article about the tenth anniversary of weblogs. I guess WSJ online is running a series or something, because today (via boingboing) I came across this, “The Good, the Bad, and the Web 2.0.” It’s a debate between a couple of folks who have books I ought to at least browse through:

“Andrew Keen, who wrote “The Cult of the Amateur,” argues the Web has become overwhelmed with useless noise. David Weinberger, author of “Everything is Miscellaneous,” argues that Web 2.0 tools let users filter out irrelevant (or inaccurate) information.”

I haven’t read the debate yet though….

"Happy Blogiversary," from WSJ.com

Just as I am ready to get back from vacation and ease into quasi-sabbatical mode, I stumbled across this article, “Happy Blogiversary,” from the WSJ.com. It is a pretty good and rather long article that spells out the “state of affairs” of blogging, at least from the point of view of a rather conservative newspaper about the world of business. This is certainly something that would be useful to teach a variety of different classes for sure.

Actually, it’s one of those articles that, in relationship to my “Blogs as Writerly Spaces” project, I find simultaneously really helpful and really intimidating. It’s helpful because it features a number of famous and semi-famous folks– bloggers and not– talking about why they read/write blogs, and it includes some interesting history. But it’s intimidating because it is one of those articles that, in very basic terms, probably sums up the point I’m trying to make with this project. And if my project can be summed up in a WSJ article, well, is my sabbatical project really a project?

These are normal doubts and misgivings at the beginning of a big project like this, I suppose. It feels a little like working on my dissertation. I recall going through these oscillations where I felt like my diss was literally about everything and therefore impossible, and/or that my diss was common sense and therefore irrelevant. I suspect this project will take some similar turns.

Oh well. I’m just easing into this project. The first things I’m going to do is read and clean my desk, so it’ll be a while before I have to doubt myself too much.

12 important U.S. Laws every blogger needs to know

One of my students in Writing for the World Wide Web sent me this: “12 Important U.S. Laws Every Blogger Needs to Know,” which is from something called the Aviva Directory. It seems like an authoritative article, though the source makes me a little suspicious. In any event, it would be a good reading for the next time I teach Writing for the Web, which will probably be next spring, It might be useful for my research project, too.

Foundations in the virtual world

Via my department head, I learned about this, “MacArthur President Jonathan Fanton and Second Life CEO Philip Rosedale Are Inviting Us,” and by “Us,” they mean HASTAC. There’s some more information on all this at the MacArthur Foundation web site too. Basically, there’s going to be a Second Life gathering next week (June 22, 9 am PST) in the virtual Second Life world about (virtual?) philanthropy.

I dunno. I might have a bad attitude, but I think that Second Life is… well, um, kind of goofy. And I say this as someone who went through a phase of playing the equally (even more) goofy game of The Sims. Maybe these virtual envirionments will be the “next big thing;” or maybe the money being made here is just the latest tulip.

Testing yet again (and possibly changing directions entirely)

I don’t know why, but I’ve had a series of blog freak-outs lately. Let’s see if this works any better.

Update:
I am not guessing I’m going to get a lot of feedback on this, but I seem to be having some blog problems that perhaps boil down to a sort of accidental mish-mash of different versions of WordPress. I think I’m going to try to attempt a major reinstall of WordPress– that is, totally erasing the current directory and replace it with all squeaky-clean and fresh WordPress 2.2– and see if that does it.

Frankly, I’ve been contemplating lately going to a system where I just keep one blog anyway– that is, combining this space with my unofficial blog space, but doing it in a way that allows for readers to still choose what to read. Maybe have RSS feeds for the categories “academia” and “life” or something.

In any event, sorry for the less than tidy blog right now. Maybe it will improve soon.

Update #2:
I will spare folks– especially all three of my readers, none of whom care about this– the technical details, but as far as I can tell, my previous WordPress theme just stopped working for some reason. My hypothesis is that it has something to do with my upgrade to the newer version of this software. I’m not sure.

In any event, for the time-being, I’m going to keep this current theme, “greenart.” I kinda like it, actually. Beyond the short-term though I still wonder about the idea of merging this official blog with my more unofficial “life” blog. I have mixed feelings, but no time to worry about those mixed feelings for now. So, for the time being, enjoy the new look, even if it’s likely not permanent.

Blog writing: attention vs. productive procrastination

At the recent Computers and Writing conference in Detroit, I went to a presentation where Derek Mueller talked the role of “attention” in motivation for blog writing. I’m simplifying quite a bit just because I don’t have my notes here (though, note to self– remember to ask Derek for a copy of his talk).

Derek had a lot of good points in his talk, but I managed to stumble across another explanation that seems to explain a lot of the blogging that I do: structured procrastination.

It’s kind of an old essay by John Perry, no slouch of a Philosophy professor at Stanford. “Structured Procrastination” is a brief internet essay I probably should have come across earlier (had I been paying attention); regardless, it seems to ring a bell to the practice of blogging. For example:

I have been intending to write this essay for months. Why am I finally doing it? Because I finally found some uncommitted time? Wrong. I have papers to grade, textbook orders to fill out, an NSF proposal to referee, dissertation drafts to read. I am working on this essay as a way of not doing all of those things. This is the essence of what I call structured procrastination, an amazing strategy I have discovered that converts procrastinators into effective human beings, respected and admired for all that they can accomplish and the good use they make of time.

Yeah, that sounds about right.

Of course, it looks to me that Perry is still procrastinating from going into any more detail about all this procrastination. But that’s another project….

No, this blog is not about…

I’m actually afraid to fill in the rest of that for fear that I will attract more “beyond spam” spam. Here’s what I’m getting at:

I’ve been actively ignoring my blog for the last few days simply because I am completely swamped with school right now. I was going/probably still will post something on EMUtalk.org about this, but I kind of feel like I have what I like to refer to as the spring/summer term blues. Here at EMU, we have fall term and winter term (what most folks call spring term), each of which are 15 weeks long, and two summer school terms called spring term and summer term. And actually, the naming makes sense since these are the seasons when these terms take place. It sure is heck not “spring” around here until April at the earliest.

But I digress.

The bad thing about spring/summer terms is that they are 7.5 weeks long, which means that everything moves twice as fast as a “normal” term. Thankfully, there aren’t as many meetings and the administrative load drops off in the spring and summer. But the teaching is very intense. Students taking these classes (as often as not in a mad dash to finish their college careers) do not always know what it is they’re getting themselves into, and are thus sometimes kind of crabby. And even though I’ve done this many times before (actually, I haven’t taken a whole spring or summer off in I don’t know how long), I am always surprised at how the work of the courses creeps up on me. Going to computers and writing, working on an article (I promise, I actually am working on it!), gardening, golfing, and just living my life has put me sadly and woefully behind.

Thus my blues, thus my purposeful ignoring of the blog. Again, I digress.

Anyway, I got an email from a colleague of mine who said that I had some spam of a male enhancement/performance nature on my site. I assumed it was of the typical sort of comment spam. But no, this was different; this spam was one where somehow the attack came on the header information of the blog itself. So, instead of seeing “Steven D. Krause’s Official Blog,” readers saw some information on various enhancement products beginning with a “v.”

I’m not sure this self-censorship is necessary, but I think it’s interesting….

So, if you come across this space and see that kind of message, rest assured, I didn’t do it. And I promise to return and be more vigilant about blog security soon. Really.

MySpace Warning in the Local Media Yet Again

Here’s the 3,435,671th warning about putting stuff on MySpace (or Facebook) and thinking that it’s completely private, though this one has a twist: The Ann Arbor News ran a lead story in last night’s paper with the headline “Online comments roil officials.” Frankly, my first reaction was “what does ‘roil’ mean?” My wife, smarter than me, set me straight– “pissed off.” Anyway, here are the opening passages:

Editor’s note: This story contains a term that may offend some readers. The News does not print profanity unless it is important for the understanding of the story.

Saline High School Senior Bobby Schilke thought the disparaging comments he posted on Facebook.com about the school district superintendent would only be seen by other members of his network on the Web site.

Schilke, 18, was surprised when he was called to the superintendent’s office with his parents for what he described as a scolding.

Beverley Geltner, the Saline superintendent, found out about the group – called “new superintendent = bitch” – and other sites she said contained “inappropriate language.” She held meetings with families, including the one with Schilke and his parents.

Geltner said the aim of the meetings was to address the “limited understanding” that parents and young people have about the dangers of Internet postings.

“A lot of things were said about people, including me, that were hurtful, ignorant,” said Geltner, who declined to say how many students were involved in meetings. “I paused and thought, ‘What is my responsibility?’ These are our students.”

Schilke’s father Ken Schilke said his son did nothing wrong.

“There’s no shame in expressing yourself,” said Ken Schilke, who attended the meeting along with Bobby Schilke’s mother. “Unless (not criticizing administrators) is in the code of conduct, then there’s no reason to quash the freedom of expression.”

This is kind of an interesting case/example, if you ask me. On the one hand, I wouldn’t be real pleased if there was a MySpace book calling me a “bitch” or whatever. But on the other hand, I don’t think I’d call that student into my office and yell at them. And on the third hand, it seems to me that if you are the superintendent of a school district, then you are more or less a “public figure” and open yourself up for that kind of criticism.

One way or the other though, it’s clear to me that Geltner over-reacted and the Ann Arbor News took on this story since it contained the oh-so-dangerous words My Space. Well, that and the word “bitch.”

Anyway, the solution here is to have some workshops and meetings to talk about some of the “safety and privacy” issues with MySpace. Geltner said that she was bothered by some of the groups on both MySpace and Facebook that had racial and gender-biased language. Back to the paper itself:

n cases where she perceived a threat, Geltner said she was be obligated to call the police. In other instances, such as Schilke’s, she notified parents and brought the family in for a meeting.

Geltner declined to say how many threats she may have passed along to the police, but Pittsfield Township Director of Public Safety John Phillips said that those found threatening are currently under investigation.

“Kids talk to each other, they think it’s the same type of secrecy as going into a room, writing in a diary and locking it in the top drawer,” Phillips said.

Phillips will be among the speakers at the community meetings Wednesday. The seminars were planned for parents and students to shed light on online risks, Geltner said.

“Young people may unwittingly be opening themselves to consequences they hadn’t thought about,” she said.

Consequences like being hauled into the superintendent’s office, no doubt.

On the one hand, it probably isn’t a bad idea to alert/remind students about the consequences of posts on Facebook, MySpace, blogs, etc., that these things aren’t completely private. Although as an aside, I think this is something that most high school and college-aged folks already know. I mean, I’ve had these sorts of conversations with my 9 year-old son, and the idea that the internet is a very public space is common sense to him.

But clearly, clearly, the main reason why Geltner is doing this is because some kid called her a “bitch” in a public forum. They could have had these community meetings on the “dangers” of MySpace months– years– ago. The fact that it took Geltner and the other folks in Saline this long to find out about this new fangled thing called MySpace is problematic, and the idea that the motivation for these meetings is “safety” when it clearly is about taking offense at being called a bad name is even more troubling.