Bullet-proof Bear Bags (or Gmail ads can be kind of weird)

I’m pretty much a total convert to gmail, but I have to say that the ads they run with my messages can be kind of strange sometimes. Usually, the ads seem to correspond to my messages. For example, since I write a lot of emails that have to do with teaching and college, there are a lot of ads on the right for things like online degree programs and teaching materials and stuff. I tend not to think about them a whole lot.

I just checked my email now though and at the top of my inbox was this ad copy:

Bullet Proof Bear Bag – www.Ursack.com – 8 Ounces–Cuts Pack Weight and Bulk Alternative to Hard Bear Canisters

The video on the site linked above was so nice I could not resist embedding it here:

And this ad targeted at someone whose idea of camping most certainly does not include the need to have a lightweight bag to store food so that bears cannot get it. Advertising gone to waste, bear bag people.

I didn't even know it was ill

Via Huffington Post comes this, “Email is Dead,” at least to teens who use MySpace and Facebook.

I never buy these kinds of pronouncements. While I do like Facebook and all, but I certainly don’t use it as a substitute for email. And frankly, a lot of my students at EMU do not have a Faceebook or a MySpace account, and they have no interest in such a thing. danah boyd got in a bit of a dust-up recently by making some generalizations about Facebook versus MySpace users, but it seems to me the group she left off entirely were the folks who either have gotten off the Facebook/MySpace bandwagon and/or who never got on it in the first place.

iPhone envy, part 2: I touched it

A couple days ago, I stopped by a AT&T store and I spent about fifteen minutes playing with an iPhone. It wasn’t a religious experience or anything, but it was pretty cool.

I happened to be there when the store opened at 10 am, so there was no one else in there when I arrived. They had a couple of iPhones leashed down at a display up front, so I went and played for a few minutes before I had to go on to scheduled meetings for the day. I tinkered with the phone for about five seconds, mostly because I am familiar with the way phones work and to me, it’s the least exciting feature of the iPhone. I didn’t mess with the mail program since it looks like Apple’s Mail software, which would mean that I probably couldn’t do much in the way of try it out without actually setting it up. I forgot to look at the iPod features for some reason. On the home screen, there are some buttons/options that I would never use, things like checking stock prices, and I didn’t bother to figure out if there was a way to configure the preferences on the main page (there probably is).

What I mostly played around with was the browser, which is very VERY nice. It works like they advertise. You enter in a URL with a tiny thumb keyboard (a touchscreen/virtual keyboard of course) and a very tiny but surprisingly clear of a web page comes up, basically as it would display in Safari. You tap twice on the part you want to magnify and it zooms in to that portion. Then you can move around this magnified image to different parts of the web page, sort of like the way you can move around a map on the web. When you tap a box where you can enter text, you get a cursor and a the tiny thumb keyboard. I actually commented on my previous iPhone post with it.

So while I’m still not going to go out and buy one, I would think about it seriously if my phone contract was up.

Two other things though:

When I was in the store, this guy came in, and, kinda determined-like, he went right up to the store clerk dude standing next to me and said “I want to know if this thing can replace my Blackberry.” So the clerk hands him the other iPhone and starts to point out some features, but determined dude just starts clicking away. Literally, two minutes later, he announces that no indeed, this is no replacement for his Blackberry and he storms out. Obviously, he was trying to prove a previously made conclusion, though he might be right: if all you need is a phone and something to check your email, then a Blackberry might be a better choice. If you want what amounts to a really little computer with a phone and an iPod, then the iPhone might be a better choice.

Second, jill/txt has a really good post here that links to another post about a dude who figured out how to make an iPhone work the way I want it to work– not as a phone at all but just a wifi mini-computer with an iPod– and that also lists some of the things the iPhone won’t do that most European cell phone users are used to doing with their phones. Kinda interesting.

danah boyd myspace v. facebook article (and a BAWS example?)

Via jill/txt, I came across this entry from apophenia (Danah Boyd’s blog) called “viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace.” I think it’s interesting, though not necessarily because of the subject matter. Boyd (or, I guess I should say, boyd) more or less argues that there is a class difference between users of MySpace and Facebook– I’ve only skimmed the article, but most of her claims seem reasonable albeit sweeping. For example, she suggests that teens from poorer backgrounds are more likely to be on MySpace than Facebook. That might be true, though at EMU, I’m always surprised by the number of my juniors and seniors who have almost no experience with either of these services.

In any event, I’m not really that interested in boyd’s argument per se (though I think this link could be useful in a class like English 516 or English 444 in a discussion about social bookmarking software), mainly because I have a really hard time getting too excited about either one of these services. I realize this is a bad attitude because there are serious people out there– like boyd, for example– who do serious scholarly work on these Internet environments.

What I’m more interested in is how this figures into my Blogs as writerly spaces project– at least in my own head. boyd wrote this essay– I do not know if she was deadly serious about it or if it was just a toss-off piece– and posted it to her blog. Suddenly, she’s getting a ton of comments and even reflecting here on this unusual level of attention. Her reaction in some ways seems similar to my own reaction on my blog when I was getting an insane number of hits posting about the EMU faculty strike. But while I felt compelled to write even more as a result of this new-found audience, boyd seems to be not that thrilled with the attention. In fact, this post suggests a certain level of “stop bugging me about this already.”

Now, I’m just brainstorming here, and I don’t really know how much of this figures into what BAWS will look like ultimately. I mean, boyd is already something of an internet celebrity, so I presume she’s used to the attention. I am not sure this particular essay has much of an impact in terms of her motivations to write or not write on a blog, though I suppose it has created an unusual exigency from her point of view. It also occurs to me now that a lot of what we’re talking about here is what can only be described as a viral text– and I have no idea why I haven’t made that connection up to this point. In my C&W presentation, I talked about the role that search engines and such figure into the functioning of rhetorical situations, and I think it’s begining to gel more clearly in my head that it is something like this.

And that ain’t that clear, is it?

In any event, I’m going to be following danah’s blog for a while, and we’ll see where it goes with this idea….

iPhone envy

I am supposed to be working but I was just scanning through Boing Boing’s entry on the Jesusphone— oops, I mean the iPhone. People are obviously collectively drugged stupid on Apple’s excellent marketing, but the reviews generally seem enthusiastic to say the least.

While I do want one of these things, that’s not going to happen for a while. I bought a new cell phone a couple weeks ago, a purchase in which I was COMPLETELY ripped off and an example of being an idiot for not doing a little more shopping. In any event, I’m locked into a two year contract, and that’s okay because I don’t have any problems with Verizon. Plus I for one am interested in seeing the second or third generation of the iPhone that will inevitably come out within the next eight to 12 months, one that will probably include more memory. Plus I’m pretty sure my wife would respond to the suggestion that I buy one of these $600 phones with the $100 a month service plan would be “over my dead body.”

Still, I am pretty sure that my next phone/iPod will be one of these things.

As a sidenote: I wonder if Apple will market something like the iPhone that isn’t, well, a phone? I mean, as it is, the iPhone can connect to a wifi network for doing various internet things. Hypothetically, I don’t see why one would have to have a phone and/or a service plan in that device, as long as a user would be happy with getting online only via wifi. I’d almost rather have just that device than one that is also bogged down with a phone.

"Podcasts replace textbooks for GATE students"

This is an especially misleading headline, but it is what it is: Podcasts replace textbook for GATE students, from the Mohave Daily News. Happily, looking at the first couple of paragraphs proves that they aren’t throwing away the textbooks exactly:

Instead of pouring over textbooks and completing worksheets, students at Diamondback Elementary School are making podcasts, creating virtual tours of fictional museums and putting together their autobiographies with digital cameras.

The Gifted And Talented Enrichment (GATE) program – offered year-round for kindergarten through eighth grade in the Bullhead City School District – launched a four-week summer program this year that has students working on MacBooks.

The MacBook runs both Apple and Windows systems, compared to the Windows-only computers the district currently uses, and has a built-in system that can take still photos and record audio and video.

Oh yeah– it’s kind of an ad for Apple, too.

This is an article that I hope is around in terms of a link next year when I teach English 516 again because it’s another one of those examples to me of the difference between just dumping laptops in the schools (and then being shocked– SHOCKED, I tell you!– when that doesn’t work) and actually integrating technology into pedagogy in a way that makes sense.

Thoof

Via boing-boing comes a link to Thoof, which is described as sort of like being a cross between a social bookmarking system like Digg with wikipedia. Could be kinda interesting to look at.

Britannica Blog debate on the Internet

I don’t have time to read this now (approaching the “end of time” for the spring 2007 term), but via boing-boing, I came across what looks like an interesting series of articles/debates on web 2.0 and the internet for furthering knowledge in general. Both the “for” and “against” arguments are available here via Clay Shirky’s entries on Britannica Blog. I can see these as potentially being useful readings for English 516 in the future.

I’m “for” the Internets, btw.

Photosynth demo

This is one of those things that I am sure is more cool in demo-mode than it could ever possibly be as a fully deployed application. Still, it is pretty cool, even if it is a quasi-Microsoft product, and it seems to only run on the MS OS:

I think the examples of looking at books or newspapers with this thing is rather compelling, besides the obvious Notre Dame example.

Flip video (and a sample including my dog)

This is one of those (many?) times in which my unofficial and official lives seem to at least cross, which is why I’m posting about this here tonight (even though I already posted about it on my unofficial blog): for reasons that I already discussed on the UOB, I ended up getting a Flip video camera for Father’s Day this year. I got mine at Costco for $90. Basically, they are tiny (a little bigger than a cell phone), low-end, easy-to-use, and (relatively) cheap digital video cameras. Mine holds up to 30 minutes worth of video on 512MB worth of flash memory– they make a 60 minute/1 GB version too. You can watch the videos on a tiny screen on the unit itself, on a TV with a cable, and, of course, on a computer.

It took me a little monkeying around and some DivX downloads to make it all work the way I wanted, but I can edit the video in QT Pro and in iMovie. Here’s an example:

I would have filmed something other than my dog, but Sophie was the only one who was willing to appear on camera. For some reason, I think the quality here is better than what Will Richardson demonstrated on Weblogg-ed about this; maybe an indoor/outdoor thing, maybe more of a close-up.

Now, these people are obviously going for the YouTube/viral video/let’s-make-a-movie-at-a-party-kind of crowd– they even describe YouTube and a site called grouper as partners– and I for one will enjoy my little tool/toy in this way too. But I got to say this makes me think in terms of teaching. I mean, while I did have a few software glitches getting it to work on the Mac, the hardest part about using it so far has been getting it out of the industrial-strength plastic wrapping. And at $100 a pop– well, that’s approaching a price where buying a whole bunch of them to check out to a group of students in first year composition or a related class seems perfectly reasonable.