Blogging as a "career?"

One of my students in my Writing for the World Wide Web page tipped me off to this the other day:

The U.S. Department of Labor puts out what I believe is an annual report called the Occupational Outlook Handbook. I recall this being the sort of thing you looked at when you went to the high school guidance counselor’s office to get ideas about what you wanted to do when you grew up; it was on paper in those days, of course.

Anyway, if you look under the entry for “writers and editors,” you will eventually come to this passage:

Bloggers write for the Internet. Most bloggers write personal reflections on a subject of close personal or professional interest. Some blogs take the form of a personal diary; others read like reports from the field—first-hand, subjective accounts of an event or an activity. Most blogs are written for recreational reasons with little expectation of earning a fee; however, some blogs promote a business or support a cause and may generate interest or income through other activities.

Well, sort of. There usually isn’t money in blogging, but I’m not sure it’s recreational exactly.

Actually, a search on monster.com with the key-term “blog” does turn up a surprising number of jobs. The problem is that most of them are on the computer-geek side of things– design an interface, be the software engineer for, etc. No ads that say something like “Seeking the random thoughts– sometimes useful, often times not– of a middle-aged academic blogger. Low six figures. Pseudoanonymous identity bloggers will be considered.” And so forth.

I guess I’ll keep looking….

Even more MySpace stuff (and this will probably be it for a while on that….)

I don’t want to obsess or dwell on the whole MySpace thing, but we were talking about blog issues in my grad class Monday, so it seems like a good time to post about some of the things we talked about in class.

MySpace controversies have become local, as is evident in this and this Detroit Free Press articles. To quote from the first one:

A presentation by two Lakeview High School students trying to warn classmates about the dangers of putting personal information on the Internet led to their teacher being escorted from the St. Clair Shores building because administrators thought pictures used in the project were too risque.

The segment, roughly eight minutes, that was broadcast to the entire school Tuesday on its in-house TV network featured pictures students in the district had posted on MySpace.com. They showed students drinking, posing provocatively or partially nude, and in one case kissing a vodka bottle.

I don’t know exactly what the deal is here (though if someone can hunt down this video that these kids put together for their school, I’d love to see it), but as far as I can tell from these two articles, while the student report was accurate and probably useful, it also featured stuff that really shows up on MySpace that school officials would rather not know about.

Anyway, my graduate course this semester features about five or so high school teachers, and without a doubt, the rules are different there than they are in (so-called) higher ed. For me, it’s one thing for me to see pictures of students (even mine) drinking or wearing swimwear or whatever; it’s another thing entirely when you’ve got high school kids– minors– doing these things.

On the other hand, this is what “the kids” are doing, as they say. One of my students, who is a high school teacher around here, brought up some MySpace pages from kids in his classes, and these pages featured pictures of scantily clad young people, lots of drinking, etc., etc. Now, this puts my student, these other students’ teacher, into a kind of problematic place because since these kids are, well, kids, my student/their teacher does have at least some (potentially) responsibility here.

The other thing that makes it tough for these high school teacher-types is the broad spectrum of reactions from stake-holders. On the one side, you’ve got parents and teachers who are outraged (outraged, I tell you!) that teenagers are getting together and drinking and doing sexually risque things, and the absolute last thing these people want to do is talk about these things (or sex education or drug use or whatever) with kids in school– it’ll put the wrong idea in their mushy heads. On the complete other side of the spectrum though, you’ve got parents (at least according to my students who are high school teachers) who are so out of touch with their kids or so overly tolerant of the behavior of their children that they’ve become enablers, the kinds of parents who buy the kids the kegs on the theory that “at least they’re drinking where I can see them.” These parents probably don’t care if their fifteen year-old daughter is posing on her MySpace pages in a skimpy bikini with a bottle of vodka in one hand a cup of beer in the other. And in a sense, these parents are as big of a problem for high school teachers since these are the people that are driving the first group of parents over the edge.

Me? Hey, my students are adults whether they want to admit that or not. I think it’s ill-advised for them to post pictures of themselves doing drunk and stupid things, but it’s their problem. I’m not going to call their parents. And my son is 8, so for at least a few years, I don’t think we’re going to have to worry too much about this.

One of the things we did in class Monday night was actually sign up for a MySpace account, and anyone who is curious about this space ought to do the same thing. For one thing, MySpace’s “age of consent” for participating in its forums is 14, which strikes me as a bit young, at least too young without some kind of parental consent. As I understand it (I can’t remember where I read this), MySpace started as a space for 18 and above, and then they lowered the age to 16, and then 14. That seems a pretty crass way to get more users.

The other significant thing (I think) is when you sign up for a MySpace account, you see almost immediately how this is really a social networking software about “hooking up” in all the meanings of that term and it is not a writerly space. And actually, it seems to be kind of a swarmy social space. The first thing you do with MySpace is you set up your “background and profile;” the first point there is “Marital status;” and the first button option is “swinger.” The second thing you fill out is your sexual orientation. Click on over to “networking,” and there’s a “field” option, which seems like a good idea at first– I could maybe “network” with fellow teachers or writers or students or what-have-you. But those aren’t the fields they have in mind. Instead, the fields listed don’t include education and they do include dance, fashion, film, gaming, television, and nightlife. Oh, and each one of these has a sub-field and a role; so, for example, if you select “dance,” you can then easily select “performer” and then select “exotic dancer.”

And as far as blogging goes: it’s easy to upload and display pictures on MySpace, but the blogging function seems buried to me, and most of the MySpace pages I’ve seen just don’t include one.

So I don’t know. On the one hand, I still think that there are many mountains made out of MySpace mole hills in the press. I don’t think MySpace is to blame for getting kids killed at a party (we don’t blame the phone company for these kinds of things either), I think that MySpace is merely making activities that teenagers have done forever visible to a large audience, and an audience that clearly is much larger than most of these kids realize. I’m not in favor of school districts closing MySpace access down, and I am in favor of using MySpace as a “teaching moment.”

On the other hand, MySpace really is pretty stupid.

Saturday Morning (Now Afternoon) Blog Round-up

In an effort to catch up on blog reading and procrastinate from the things I ought to really be doing, I offer this long list of useful (to me) links to readings/entries from blogs in my RSS feed published in the last week or so:

I think that’s it– heck, isn’t that enough?

MySpace: The Movie

Yesterday, I came across “Online parody ‘MySpace: The Movie’ helps launch amateur’s career,” an AP story that showed up in a lot of places (this link is from the Kansas City Star because it was the one that showed up first in news.google.com). It’s about how a kid– almost literally (he’s 21)– is apparently going to get a film deal based on several movies that he’s made.

Anyway, the one that has gotten all the best press is “MySpace: The Movie,” an 11 or so minute short that is a parody of various MySpace habits. The link here is from the YouTube site because this guy’s web site– David Lehre Productions— is getting about 1.8 million hits a day right now. Oh, and as far as I can tell, this guy is from the ‘burbs of Detroit.

A camcorder, a Macintosh computer, and you’ve got a chance….

Four quasi- related blogging thoughts

The first two of which come to me via Alex Halavais’ blog:

  • Wired News has a nice little FAQ about MySpace, mostly based on conversation with and research by Danah Boyd. It’s pretty good advice I suppose, but to be honest, some of it kind of sounds like it is coming from the point of view of someone without children. I’ve been contacted about MySpace and Facebook recently, and I guess my take on it is let the kids play with it, but keep an eye on what they’re doing. (BTW, as I type this, I am in Florida and by the pool, watching my 8 year-old son swimming. The pool is shallow enough for him to touch his feet to the bottom anywhere and he is an okay swimmer as it is. But despite my confidence in him, I am supervising the kid).

    I want to come back to this and similar articles about MySpace and Facebook and stuff because I’m going to be giving a presentation on April 1 (no kidding!) about blogs and part of what I want to say at that forum is that things like MySpace and Facebook aren’t blogs at all and to sort of lump them all into one category and talk about the evils of blogging is dangerous.

  • The Chicago Tribune had an editorial called “Bloggy, we hardly knew ye” that once again announces the end of blogging. I like Alex’s comments on this, but in general, it seems like wishful thinking on the newspaper’s part.
  • I’ve been thinking a lot on my quasi-vacation here about writing a book about blogging; long story that I don’t have to write about now, but something about doing a lot of sitting around in either airplanes or automobiles or on the beach has got me thinking…..
  • For someone who has been away from his laptop, I sure have done a lot of stuff on the computer.

Enron Trial Blog: Newspaper expanding its coverage

On NPR this morning, they had a story about the blog “Enron: TrialWatch,” which is written by Houston Chronicle staff covering the trial. It seems interesting because the point that the reporter made in the NPR interview is that the blog creates a space to cover aspects of the trial that either doesn’t fit or isn’t appropriate for the newspaper pieces.

Funny; just a year or so ago, newspaper (aka “dinosaur blogs”) were running pieces about how blogging just couldn’t possibly be credible sources. Now it is a bit of if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.

I Need To Do Some Updating….

See? I told you I wouldn’t stay away for long….

Anyway, a comment from someone asked when I was going to set up an RSS feed for this site, and even though that comment was really spam, they did have a good point. So I set up a Feedburner feed; I might do something different sometime soon.

I don’t know if I’ll be able to do this here or not, but I have been meaning to set up a podcasting element to the site. Since I went ahead anddid the feed….

Academic Blogging (No Kidding…)

Jeff “Yellow Dog” Rice has a nice piece in his favorite internet publication, Inside Higher Education, called “Serious Bloggers.” Lots of good stuff here, most of which I agree with.

Four thoughts:

  • I completely COMPLETELY agree with the bit about anonymous academic blogging, a practice I have thought problematic for a long time. See, for example this entry and this one from the distant past (oh, okay, a year and a half ago). But I really like Jeff’s turn on the term “seriousness” in this essay. He writes:

    The consequences of this seriousness can be quite problematic, more problematic than whether or not a reader will take offense (or even retribution) at one’s postings. The consequence of this seriousness is stagnation. When we become too serious about novel ideas too quickly, we deny ourselves the ability to experiment with and develop the very innovations in communication we are attracted to in the first place. In turn, we replicate processes already in circulation; i.e., we maintain a status quo and fail to explore possibilities raised by the new medium. One hears that stagnation in the repeated refrains of “fear� pseudonymous bloggers express or the tropes of general complaining many pseudonymous weblogs turn out.

  • Some of the comments on this piece strike me as misguided. Folks, when Rice suggests we need to take the form of blogging “less seriously,” I don’t think he is talking about “being funny” per se.
  • On the other hand (#1), academic bloggers often want their blog writing to be taken “seriously” in an academic sense of it “counting” for something. Many of the folks in this circle of bloggers has written about this in the past– possibly even Jeff.
  • On still yet another hand (#2), academic (and other) bloggers, serious ones and not so serious ones, always self-censor in the sense that no one ever reveals everything about their lives on their blogs. As a simple example, while Jeff’s blog is indeed a mix of all sorts of different things, I don’t think you’ll find him complaining about his students or his colleagues on his blog. Conversely, it seems to me the main purpose of a lot of anonymous academic blogs is specifically to bitch about the people the work with and the students they have to teach. (Okay, maybe Bitch, PhD doesn’t really do that, but I couldn’t resist the link.)

That’s enough– I don’t want to take this too seriously, and now I have to get on with the day a bit.

Blargon (?!) in the NYT (and none of it from me…)

Loyal readers, do you remember how, a couple weeks ago now, I had a post seeking blog specific jargon? Well, I feel comfortable now revealing that the inquiry that prompted that post came from none other than William Safire and it resulted in this article in the New York Times Magaine this weekend.

Well, okay, it wasn’t from Safire directly; it was from one of his researchers. But he (the researcher, that is) did email and leave me a phone voice mail message about this back at the end of January/begining of February, and I obliged with a blog posting trolling for requesting input.

It’s an okay enough piece, but I guess I have two critiques, both of which I suppose are semi-obvious. First, a lot of the terms/jargon in this article seem, well, a bit of a stretch for me. I mean, “moonbats?” “deliciousing?” “blegging?” I dunno…

Second, Safire makes no mention of me nor any of the comments on my post about this. I feel kinda used.

Blog-o-lingo?

I received kind of a strange email today from… well, I’m not going to say, because that wouldn’t be right for now; let’s just say it was someone employed at a national publication who said it might be appropriate to describe him or her as a “friend or an interested party.”

Anyway, this person was asking me (as an “expert” of sorts on blogs) about any sort of particular language/termonology unique to blogs and blogging. An example this person gave included blogola (which I assume is like payola?)

It’s an interesting question, but I don’t really have much to offer. There is of course the term “Carnival,” a sort of anthology-building blog community– see “Blog Carnival.” Then there’s “blogosphere” and I think there was (for a while, at least) something “klogs,” which were supposed to be “knowledge blogs.” I saw a comic strip– Non Sequitur I think– that referred to newspapers as “dinosaur blogs.” I liked that.

The one blog lingo that always bugs me is kind of the opposite of lingo: it’s when newspapers and other sources feel compelled to explain/define the term “blog” in some stupid and inevitably old-fashioned way, usually an awkward one. As in “a ‘blog,’ or ‘web log,’ is an internet published journal,” or something like that. To me it always sounds kind of like “a ‘car,’ often times called an ‘automobile’ or just ‘auto,’ can take passengers from one place to another.”

In any event, what do folks think? Any good blog terms of art and/or lingo out there?