There’s a good article in the October 29 Inside Higher Ed, “When Wikipedia is the assignment.” It’ll be good for something like English 516. It’s another report from the Educause conference, and it’s about how a professor teaching a course in the University of Washington at Bothell’s “Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences” program (sounds a bit like a gen ed class to me) has required her students to post their papers to Wikipedia. To quote from the article:
At first glance, a college term paper and a Wikipedia entry appear to have little in common. Term papers are intended for an â€œextremely limited audience, namely, me,â€� as Groom pointed out, they have little impact outside of the classroom and are constrained to a specific â€œtimeâ€� and â€œplaceâ€� in the world of ink-on-paper documents. â€œThat is not a very good model of scholarship, to say that anything you produce [belongs] in this tiny space,â€� she said.
On the other hand, shared, public online documents have characteristics in common with parts of the academic review process. â€œThe shift to thinking about placing the term paper as a Wikipedia encyclopedia entry allows for another level of peer review,â€� [Martha] Groom said. Such entries have references and citations; allow for a process of repeated, continual editing; and encourage collaborations between authors.
They also reach a much wider audience, through the Wikipedia site and search engines. â€œHow do you motivate students to do their best work?â€� she asked â€” implying that the answer lies in the possibility of others viewing it. The public nature of Wikipedia content also means that, in theory, students would be less likely to reuse othersâ€™ material as their own.
In short, Wikipedia is a good place for students to publish their work because it encourages students to write beyond the teacher, it encourages revision/peer review/collaboration, it shows the importance of citation, and it makes writing public. Sound familiar?
Now, don’t get me wrong– I think what Groom is doing here is great, and I think there are lots of reasons why this would be a fantastic activity for fy comp or other research writing classes. But I always have some involuntary eye-rolling when someone in another discipline discovers something about writing pedagogy (e.g., “hey, let’s get students to write something not just for the teacher!” or “hey, let’s get them to collaborate on their writing!”) that folks in my field have known for decades.