<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Student writing is getting worse&#8211; or wait, it&#8217;s getting better!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevendkrause.com/2009/08/25/student-writing-is-getting-worse-or-wait-its-getting-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevendkrause.com/2009/08/25/student-writing-is-getting-worse-or-wait-its-getting-better/</link>
	<description>School, work, life, and everything else</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 04:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cat Ennis</title>
		<link>http://stevendkrause.com/2009/08/25/student-writing-is-getting-worse-or-wait-its-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4880</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat Ennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevendkrause.com/?p=567#comment-4880</guid>
		<description>Hah, thank you so much for this post! I&#039;m getting ready to start teaching freshman composition at Emerson College for the first time. I read Stanley Fish&#039;s article and felt that I should revise my syllabus because we spend time discussing outsourcing, graffiti, generational gaps...a lot of stuff other than grammar and rhetoric. But I could not figure out how I could teach just grammar and rhetoric. What would I use as examples? Some kind of ethereal Platonic pure form of rhetoric? And how could I get the students interested in writing without having something to write about? 

Then I realized Fish&#039;s evidence that students aren&#039;t as good as they used to be is sort of fishy. I do not believe him when he says that his grad students could not &quot;write a clean English sentence. They could manage for about six words and then, almost invariably, the syntax (and everything else) fell apart.&quot; How could it even be possible that grad students could only write six words? 

Thanks for your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, thank you so much for this post! I&#8217;m getting ready to start teaching freshman composition at Emerson College for the first time. I read Stanley Fish&#8217;s article and felt that I should revise my syllabus because we spend time discussing outsourcing, graffiti, generational gaps&#8230;a lot of stuff other than grammar and rhetoric. But I could not figure out how I could teach just grammar and rhetoric. What would I use as examples? Some kind of ethereal Platonic pure form of rhetoric? And how could I get the students interested in writing without having something to write about? </p>
<p>Then I realized Fish&#8217;s evidence that students aren&#8217;t as good as they used to be is sort of fishy. I do not believe him when he says that his grad students could not &#8220;write a clean English sentence. They could manage for about six words and then, almost invariably, the syntax (and everything else) fell apart.&#8221; How could it even be possible that grad students could only write six words? </p>
<p>Thanks for your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felicia Steele</title>
		<link>http://stevendkrause.com/2009/08/25/student-writing-is-getting-worse-or-wait-its-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia Steele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevendkrause.com/?p=567#comment-4879</guid>
		<description>A wonderful post! And as usual, the best representations of a two sided debate represent a middle path as possibility: if we actually talk about what constitutes good writing, we might learn how to teach it better! Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful post! And as usual, the best representations of a two sided debate represent a middle path as possibility: if we actually talk about what constitutes good writing, we might learn how to teach it better! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Walker</title>
		<link>http://stevendkrause.com/2009/08/25/student-writing-is-getting-worse-or-wait-its-getting-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4875</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevendkrause.com/?p=567#comment-4875</guid>
		<description>Krause -- I love you and this post both.  Excellent work. Funny, pointed, full of useful stuff.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krause &#8212; I love you and this post both.  Excellent work. Funny, pointed, full of useful stuff.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
